Nicolas,

Your great suggestion makes me nervous ... It is possible for a hacker to
change the index so big that it can hog the CPU, which busy creating empty
node, for each request.

However, I cant come up with another solution

Any comments? anyone?

-D
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nicolas De Loof" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 5:19 AM
Subject: Re: Too many session scoped form beans!


> Reading my own post I realize this code will throw an
IndexOutOfBoundsException
>
> You need to put 'empty' datas on the List as needed :
>
> protected List item;
>
> public void setItem(int index, Object obj) {
>     if (this.item == null) {
>         this.item = new ArrayList(index);
>     }
>     for (int i = this.item.size(); i < index; i++) {
>         this.item.add("");
>     }
>     this.item.add(index, obj);
> }
>
> Nico.
>
> > I think you can use something like this in a request scoped form-bean :
> >
> >
> > protected List item;
> >
> > public void setItem(int index, Object obj) {
> >     if (this.item == null) {
> >         this.item = new ArrayList(index);
> >     } else {
> >         this.item.ensureCapacity(index);
> >     }
> >     this.item.add(index, obj);
> > }
> >
> > This way, when form-bean population occurs, you will get a new
Collection when needed.
> >
> > Nico.
> >
> >
> > > I'd like to know if it's possible to avoid using to many session
scoped
> > > form beans.
> > >
> > > I have a bean that contains a collection and I use nested:iterate to
> > > display entry fields on my html:form. When the form is submitted, I
get
> > > an error in BeanUtils.populate(), because the new bean (when the bean
is
> > > request scoped) contains an empty collection and populate() tries to
set
> > > the properties of the elements that existed on the bean of the
previous
> > > request.
> > >
> > > If I change the bean to session scope, everything works fine (because
> > > now the bean is the same for both requests), but I think it's kind of
> > > messy to have lots of session scoped beans.
> > >
> > > I'd appreciate to have any comments on this subject.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Jorge Mascena
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to