My experience with the html/xhtml quandary is that if the <html:xhtml />
tag is used, then all the tags except <form> are valid "xhtml 1.0+ dtd
tags". This is because the form tag insists on using the 'name="foo"'
attribute. The name attribute has been deprecated in favor of id.
Mark Lowe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.com> To
"Struts Users Mailing List"
09/03/03 01:10 PM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
Please respond to Subject
"Struts Users Re: Subject: Re: Struts html tags
Mailing List" and XHTML 1.0....Again
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rta.apache.org>
Re: my last post about not working with tiles. Seems to work fine if
you place <html:xhtml /> in the tiles itself..
Nice..
On Wednesday, September 3, 2003, at 06:24 PM, Marco Tedone wrote:
> Well, I download the binaries of Struts 1.1 and the functionality is
> supported.
>
> Hope this will help,
>
> Marco
>
> <ORIGINAL MESSAGE>
> From: Mark Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> That's great..
>
> I'm running 1.1 , yes and the base tag renders as xhtml. I'll certainly
> be sleeping more soundly.
>
> I've just downloaded the latest stable release and as far as form
> elements are concerned it doesn't, either that or it just hates me. As
> I imagine you know, these changes are in the head version in cvs, so i
> guess they'll be along with the next release or something. But struts
> 1.1 doesn't seem to ship with this functionality.
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
