For starters:
If you have a dynaform defined like so:
<form-bean name="searchForm" type="com.foo.ui.form.SearchForm">
<form-property name="userName" type="java.lang.String"/>
</form-bean>
You have to define the above in the merge file and then define the java
supporting class with no Xdoclets tag.
I would much perfer to be able to do:
/**
* @struts.form name="searchForm"
* @struts.property name="userName" type="java.lang.String"
*/
In my java class and have it auto generate the above merge xml.
The whole tiles support in Xdoclet could be more robust as well.
-Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: Nick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 2:12 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [POLL] ActionFrom vs DynaActionForm
What else would you like the DynaForms for XDoclet to do? Since I
released the patch to 1.2b3 (or beta 4?), I haven't had any feedback
about it.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 02:06:11PM -0400, Chen, Gin wrote:
> You'll love Xdoclet.
> Unfortunately it doesn't provide anything more than a merge point for
> DynaForms but still very very cool.
> Try a simple struts app using it (I think there's an example one on the
> site).
> -Tim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 1:41 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: RE: [POLL] ActionFrom vs DynaActionForm
>
>
> #2 - It was I revelation when I realised I didn't need to write
ActionForms!
>
> (But one day soon I'm going to look at XDoclet to see what that can do for
> me).
>
> Steve
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mainguy, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: September 30, 2003 9:52 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [POLL] ActionFrom vs DynaActionForm
> >
> >
> > Next in my series of struts-user polls (please complain if this gets
old).
> >
> > What sort of ActionForms does everyone use?
> >
> > #1 ActionForm
> > #2 DynaActionForm
> >
> > Personally, I'm an advocate of the DynaActionForm as it seems to
> > be able to
> > do 80-90% of everything I need to do and everything else can be done in
my
> > business tier. I have, however, run into another person who is dead set
> > against using it. His rationale is that you are then unable to do
custom
> > validation when you use the DynaValidatorForm... I think you can still
do
> > it, it's just a little more difficult, but, I'm polling to see if
> > I'm out in
> > left field...
> >
> >
> >
> > This message and its contents (to include attachments) are the
> > property of Kmart Corporation (Kmart) and may contain
> > confidential and proprietary information. You are hereby notified
> > that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or
> > the taking of any action based on information contained herein is
> > strictly prohibited. Unauthorized use of information contained
> > herein may subject you to civil and criminal prosecution and
> > penalties. If you are not the intended recipient, you should
> > delete this message immediately.
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Nick Heudecker
SystemMobile, Inc.
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://www.systemmobile.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
