Joe - this is working fine for me with the 1/13/2004 nightly build. I have
tried with commons-validator-1.1.1.jar and with whatever version the
commons-validator.jar in the 1/13 nightly build of struts is.

Validation worked right out of the box - all I did to "install" the nightly
build was copy over the jar, tld and xml files from the zip file.

Based on that it seems like if there is a bug, it is in struts and probably
in the newer nightly builds. (Doesn't seem like it would be in
validator-rules.xml itself though, that hasn't been updated since december)

Matt Bathje


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Joe Germuska" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 10:54 AM
Subject: bug in latest validator-rules.xml ?


> Between versions 1.47 and 1.48 of conf/share/validator-rules.xml, the
> "javascript" block for validateRequired was removed.  Now when I drop
> that file into my webapp, my form which only has required validations
> comes up with this as the entirety of its JavaScript block:
>
> <script type="text/javascript" language="Javascript1.1">
>
> <!-- Begin
>
>       var bCancel = false;
>
>      function validateForm(form) {
>          if (bCancel)
>        return true;
>          else
>         return true;
>     }
>
> //End -->
> </script>
>
> When I use 1.47, I get the normal behavior.  This form only has
> required validations, so I'm assuming it's related to the removal of
> the javascript for validateRequired, which is the change between
> these versions.
>
> Is there something I'm supposed to know to switch to the latest
> version of validator-rules?   I'm using commons-validator-1.1.1.jar
> and the Struts nightlies from sometime in the last week.  Do I need a
> newer commons-validator?
>
> I'll file a bug if it's a bug, but I thought I'd ask if there was
> some documentation that I'd missed before doing that.
>
> Joe
>
>
> -- 
> Joe Germuska
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://blog.germuska.com
>        "Imagine if every Thursday your shoes exploded if you tied them
> the usual way.  This happens to us all the time with computers, and
> nobody thinks of complaining."
>              -- Jef Raskin
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to