I feel like an idiot asking this, but...

within the <logic:iterate> </logic:iterate> tags how am I supposed to pull
out the objects I have stored in my Vector?

bort


"Mark Lowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Vector myvector = ..
>
> request.setAttrubute("myvector", myvector);
>
> ...
>
> <c:forEach var="item" items="${myvector}">
> <c:out value="${item.myproperty}" />
> <c:forEach>
>
> or
>
> <logic:iterate id="item" name="myvector">
> <bean:write name="item" property="myproperty" />
> </logic:iterate>
>
>
> The thread in question was more about  nested beans and forms, i don't
> think anyone would suggest putting readonly stuff in the session.
>
>
>
> On 4 Mar 2004, at 17:14, bort wrote:
>
> >
> > A request parameter would probably be a better solution, you're right.
> >
> > I looked up the thread you were speaking of, and see that it went in
> > the
> > direction of memory usage by the JVM when loaded up with session
> > variables.
> > Fortunately, that isn't a concern for us as we've loaded up the web
> > server
> > with RAM.
> >
> > Back to my original question...
> >
> > I guess I can just pull the Vector from the request object and iterate
> > through it then?
> >
> > ex.
> >
> > Vector myvector = (Vector)request.getParameter("vectorname");
> >
> >
> > TIA
> > bort
> >
> > "Geeta Ramani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> ..as a request attribute..? Look through the archives for a fun and
> > spirited
> >> discussion on request vs. session vars held just over a week or so
> >> ago..
> >>
> >> Geeta
> >> P.S. Mark, don't flip out..;)
> >>
> >> bort wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi all
> >>>
> >>> I have an Action class that loads up a Vector with information from a
> >>> database.  What I would like to do is pass this Vector to the
> >>> forwarding
> > JSP
> >>> and create a table listing of the data.
> >>>
> >>> I'm thinking of just adding the Vector to the session in the Action
> > class
> >>> and then retrieving and iterating through it in the JSP.  Is there a
> > better
> >>> way to do this?
> >>>
> >>> bort
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to