When you observe that log is empty and that "stunnel shows as started",
do a CTRL ALT DEL to check if there is any process called "stunnel" that is really running...

I have a doubt that, although scm says stunnel is running, in fact it is not.

Regards
Pierre

Le 22/09/2014 21:43, John Smith a écrit :
Hi I used administrator account and defaults to install. It is installed at Program Files (x86)

The service is set to run as local system account and interact with desktop is checked.

Once the machine is booted... Login open service control panel, stunnel shows as started. Go look at logs nothing there... In service control panel hit the restart button. And it comes up properly.

My config is as follows:

; Debugging stuff (may useful for troubleshooting)
;debug = 7
output = stunnel.log

; Initialize Microsoft CryptoAPI interface
engine = capi
; Also needs "engineID = capi" in each section using the CAPI engine

[es-tcp]
accept = ${SERVER_IP}:9300
connect = 127.0.0.1:9300 <http://127.0.0.1:9300>
cert = ....
CAfile = ....
verify = 2

[es-http]
accept = ${SERVER_IP}:9200
connect = 127.0.0.1:9200 <http://127.0.0.1:9200>
cert = ....
CAfile = ....
verify = 2

[es-disc-local]
client = yes
accept = 127.0.0.1:9700 <http://127.0.0.1:9700>
connect = ${SERVER_IP}:9300
cert = ....



On 22 September 2014 14:30, Pierre DELAAGE <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Hello,
    I can tell my patch was adressing read file error on conf file,
    but, unfortunately, not at all "dependencies of stunnel service at
    start up",
    which is likely to be the core pb preventing stunnel to start
    correctly at boot time for people on that thread.

    Michal added explicit dependencies at startup, that is necessary
    to solve that bug. I did not check yet its implementation.

    But maybe some services, although started, are still "not ready"
    when stunnel starts, so that this makes stunnel fail.

    I suggest that stunnel checks, not only the availability, but also
    the "efficiency" of the DNS service by trying to resolve a well
    known server.
    it should retry during, eg, 3 seconds, and then stops with some
    reports if failing to resolve the hostname,
    either by lack of network, or by lack of answer from the name
    resolver.
    But...it seems that when having problems at startup, it cannot
    even log anything....maybe this is due to the identity of "system
    user" of stunnel at that particular moment: user that may have no
    right to write on the HD.

    People should check also the installation location of stunnel : it
    is supposed (and have predefined shortcuts for that) to be
    installed PREFERABLY in "c:\program files\stunnel".
    I recommend to use that location.

    They also should try to resolve by hand the hostnames they put in
    their stunnel conf file, just to be sure.

    On some network or machines, maybe there is a problem with the
    firewall and SOME services tunneled by stunnel on forbidden ports.

    On another hand, it sounds strange that just restarting stunnel
    (in user mode or service mode ?) is solving the problem :
    this sounds like unavailability of DNS at startup.

    I did not investigate that particular problem, but I will perform
    some tests soon with the last 504 (or 505).

    Yours sincerely
    Pierre



    Le 22/09/2014 19:20, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> a
    écrit :
    Using Stunnel on several Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1 machines (all
    such machines are X64 as the OS is only released as X64).

    During August of 2014 I reported in this forum the current
    version of Stunnel would not function as a service under the
    above OS, even if using a delayed start, it might run but it
    would not work.  I reverted to using version 4.35, which did work
    properly.

    Pierre DeLagge was kind enough to provide me with a copy of his
    patched Stunnel 5.02, which I am still using and which is working
    flawlessly on my production servers.  No delayed start required.

    I am wondering if Pierre's 5.02 patch has been incorporated into
    the most recently released Stunnel, 5.04?  Has anyone been
    successful in getting the most current version to actually work
    under the above environment without delaying the start of the
    service?

    Just to add a little color and background to the story, I am
    using the native WS2008R2SP1 SMTP server on each machine, in
    conjunction with Stunnel, so as to forward OS event notifications
    through a gmail account.



    On 09.22.2014 06:54, John Smith wrote:
    I tried 5.04. on Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise Service Pack
    1 x64


    Same issue. Service shows as started, but no log. If I go manual
    restart it works.

    Have to put delayed startup.

    On 18 September 2014 16:15, John Smith <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        For now i'm happy with 5.03 Already in production so I will
        have to wait next time! :)

        On 17 September 2014 17:10, Michal Trojnara
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
        wrote:

            -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
            Hash: SHA1

            Jose Alf. wrote:
            > Regarding stunnel service dependencies, If you read
            the 5.04 beta
            > announcement, the dependency is created automatically
            now when you
            > install stunnel as a service. Please give it a try.
            Looks like it
            > works for me.
            >
            > Thanks to Mike for implementing that.

            Thank you for testing it.

            Best regards,
                    Mike
            -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
            Version: GnuPG v1

            iEYEARECAAYFAlQZ+NsACgkQ/NU+nXTHMtGdAgCdFUQ6YWXDdE0g4ZNoys3DSR0Q
            yLoAnRgo4jKIzb93fzEZcV79eoAQLXMR
            =+xFQ
            -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
            _______________________________________________
            stunnel-users mailing list
            [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
            https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users





    _______________________________________________
    stunnel-users mailing list
    [email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users



    _______________________________________________
    stunnel-users mailing list
    [email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users


    _______________________________________________
    stunnel-users mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users



_______________________________________________
stunnel-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users

Reply via email to