Sorry to tell but...

On a windows 7 home machine, with a HOSTNAME in the stunnel conf, NO DELAY at service startup :
I can start the service, then reboot,
then, at first, my log file is saying ": Error resolving 'HOSTNAME ': Neither nodename nor servname known (EAI_NONAME)" and later, when I try to use the tunnel (and at that time dns is working), resolving is working...

and everything is OK so....

Even if dns is NOT available at startup, stunnel 504 is able to resolve "later" the remote server hostname.



2014.09.23 19:23:17 LOG7[2612]: No limit detected for the number of clients
2014.09.23 19:23:17 LOG5[2612]: stunnel 5.04 on x86-pc-msvc-1500 platform
2014.09.23 19:23:17 LOG5[2612]: Compiled/running with OpenSSL 1.0.1i-fips 6 Aug 2014 2014.09.23 19:23:17 LOG5[2612]: Threading:WIN32 Sockets:SELECT,IPv6 SSL:ENGINE,OCSP,FIPS
2014.09.23 19:23:17 LOG7[2612]: errno: (*_errno())
2014.09.23 19:23:17 LOG5[2612]: Reading configuration from file stunnel.conf
2014.09.23 19:23:17 LOG5[2612]: FIPS mode disabled
2014.09.23 19:23:17 LOG7[2612]: Compression disabled
2014.09.23 19:23:17 LOG7[2612]: Snagged 64 random bytes from C:/.rnd
2014.09.23 19:23:17 LOG7[2612]: Wrote 1024 new random bytes to C:/.rnd
2014.09.23 19:23:17 LOG7[2612]: PRNG seeded successfully
2014.09.23 19:23:17 LOG6[2612]: Initializing service [https]

2014.09.23 19:23:17 LOG3[2612]: Error resolving 'HOSTNAME ': Neither nodename nor servname known (EAI_NONAME)

2014.09.23 19:23:17 LOG6[2612]: Cannot resolve connect target - delaying DNS lookup/(COMMENT : stunnel is a good fellow !)/

2014.09.23 19:23:17 LOG6[2612]: Loading cert from file: C:\Users\standard\Documents\Perso\SSL\johndoe.crt 2014.09.23 19:23:18 LOG6[2612]: Loading key from file: C:\Users\standard\Documents\Perso\SSL\johndoe.uky
2014.09.23 19:23:18 LOG7[2612]: Private key check succeeded
2014.09.23 19:23:18 LOG7[2612]: SSL options set: 0x00000004
2014.09.23 19:23:18 LOG5[2612]: Configuration successful
2014.09.23 19:23:18 LOG7[2612]: Service [https] (FD=348) bound to 127.0.0.1:81 2014.09.23 19:24:32 LOG7[2612]: Service [https] accepted (FD=208) from 127.0.0.1:49164
2014.09.23 19:24:32 LOG7[2612]: Creating a new thread
2014.09.23 19:24:32 LOG7[2612]: New thread created
2014.09.23 19:24:32 LOG7[588]: Service [https] started
2014.09.23 19:24:32 LOG5[588]: Service [https] accepted connection from 127.0.0.1:49164
2014.09.23 19:24:32 LOG6[588]: s_connect: connecting XXX.YYY.UUU.III:443
2014.09.23 19:24:32 LOG7[588]: s_connect: s_poll_wait XXX.YYY.UUU.III:443: waiting 10 seconds
2014.09.23 19:24:32 LOG5[588]: s_connect: connected XXX.YYY.UUU.III:443
2014.09.23 19:24:32 LOG5[588]: Service [https] connected remote server from 192.168.3.220:49165
2014.09.23 19:24:32 LOG7[588]: Remote socket (FD=388) initialized
2014.09.23 19:24:32 LOG6[588]: SNI: sending servername: HOSTNAME
2014.09.23 19:24:32 LOG7[588]: SSL state (connect): before/connect initialization 2014.09.23 19:24:32 LOG7[588]: SSL state (connect): SSLv2/v3 write client hello A 2014.09.23 19:24:32 LOG7[588]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 read server hello A 2014.09.23 19:24:32 LOG7[588]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 read server certificate A 2014.09.23 19:24:32 LOG7[588]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 read server certificate request A
2014.09.23 19:24:32 LOG7[588]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 read server done A
2014.09.23 19:24:32 LOG7[588]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 write client certificate A 2014.09.23 19:24:32 LOG7[588]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 write client key exchange A 2014.09.23 19:24:32 LOG7[588]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 write certificate verify A 2014.09.23 19:24:32 LOG7[588]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 write change cipher spec A
2014.09.23 19:24:32 LOG7[588]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 write finished A
2014.09.23 19:24:32 LOG7[588]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 flush data
2014.09.23 19:24:32 LOG7[588]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 read finished A

So I am sorry to say that I cannot reproduce that bug.

Anyway there are many services, on a heavy loaded machine, that can slow down the service startup or interfere with file management :

Antivirus ? try to deactivate it.
Firewall : the same...
any other piece of software that is not absolutely necessary at boot time.

Plus : Even if you don't use hostnames in conf file I suggest that you try "dnscache" dependency anyway:
because you probably have hostnames in your certificates.

Regards
Pierre



Le 23/09/2014 18:05, John Smith a écrit :
Network: Ethernet
Multiple routers: No
Firewall: No
Delay: Yes, Automitic (Delayed Start) works like a charm.
Capi engine: Yes tried turning it off
32 bit or 64 bit: 32bit running on 64 bit server. I don't see a 64 bit version on the download page?
dnscache: Haven't tried it yet.


- stunnel works fine on the server specifically with the service set to Automatic (Delayed Start). And I even tunnel properly to other machines so it not firewalls or routers or network. - Only when it's NOT (Delayed Start) stunnel doe not seem to start even though the service shows as started. - I managed to tunnel from my Desktop to the Server. I have not tried automatic service startup on Desktop because I don't have enough privilidges. But trying to setup the server, since that's the machine that will have stunnel in production.




On 23 September 2014 10:04, Pierre DELAAGE <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Have you tried to change the service dependency from "TCPIP" (the
    default in the code), to "dnscache" (ok, EVEN if you do not use
    hostname resolution),
    this is just to be sure that stunnel relies on something that is
    using tcpip as well.

    question : what kind of network interface do you have :

    wifi ?
    ethernet board ?

    Are you traversing multiple routers ?

    Are you using multiple firewalls ?

    Have you tuned a delay as suggested a few days ago ?

    Can you try without specifying "capi engine" ?

    Are you using stunnel 32 bits or 64 bits : if 64, try the 32
    version as well.

    I am reviewing the code and soon enter some test on w7-32bits.

    Regards
    Pierre



    Le 23/09/2014 15:30, John Smith a écrit :
    I wish you were right but unfortunately it's running lol

    On 22 September 2014 18:24, Pierre DELAAGE
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        When you observe that log is empty and that "stunnel shows as
        started",
        do a CTRL ALT DEL to check if there is any process called
        "stunnel" that is really running...

        I have a doubt that, although scm says stunnel is running, in
        fact it is not.

        Regards
        Pierre

        Le 22/09/2014 21:43, John Smith a écrit :
        Hi I used administrator account and defaults to install. It
        is installed at Program Files (x86)

        The service is set to run as local system account and
        interact with desktop is checked.

        Once the machine is booted... Login open service control
        panel, stunnel shows as started. Go look at logs nothing
        there... In service control panel hit the restart button.
        And it comes up properly.

        My config is as follows:

        ; Debugging stuff (may useful for troubleshooting)
        ;debug = 7
        output = stunnel.log

        ; Initialize Microsoft CryptoAPI interface
        engine = capi
        ; Also needs "engineID = capi" in each section using the
        CAPI engine

        [es-tcp]
        accept = ${SERVER_IP}:9300
        connect = 127.0.0.1:9300 <http://127.0.0.1:9300>
        cert = ....
        CAfile = ....
        verify = 2

        [es-http]
        accept = ${SERVER_IP}:9200
        connect = 127.0.0.1:9200 <http://127.0.0.1:9200>
        cert = ....
        CAfile = ....
        verify = 2

        [es-disc-local]
        client = yes
        accept = 127.0.0.1:9700 <http://127.0.0.1:9700>
        connect = ${SERVER_IP}:9300
        cert = ....



        On 22 September 2014 14:30, Pierre DELAAGE
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            Hello,
            I can tell my patch was adressing read file error on
            conf file,
            but, unfortunately, not at all "dependencies of stunnel
            service at start up",
            which is likely to be the core pb preventing stunnel to
            start correctly at boot time for people on that thread.

            Michal added explicit dependencies at startup, that is
            necessary to solve that bug. I did not check yet its
            implementation.

            But maybe some services, although started, are still
            "not ready" when stunnel starts, so that this makes
            stunnel fail.

            I suggest that stunnel checks, not only the
            availability, but also the "efficiency" of the DNS
            service by trying to resolve a well known server.
            it should retry during, eg, 3 seconds, and then stops
            with some reports if failing to resolve the hostname,
            either by lack of network, or by lack of answer from the
            name resolver.
            But...it seems that when having problems at startup, it
            cannot even log anything....maybe this is due to the
            identity of "system user" of stunnel at that particular
            moment: user that may have no right to write on the HD.

            People should check also the installation location of
            stunnel : it is supposed (and have predefined shortcuts
            for that) to be installed PREFERABLY in "c:\program
            files\stunnel".
            I recommend to use that location.

            They also should try to resolve by hand the hostnames
            they put in their stunnel conf file, just to be sure.

            On some network or machines, maybe there is a problem
            with the firewall and SOME services tunneled by stunnel
            on forbidden ports.

            On another hand, it sounds strange that just restarting
            stunnel (in user mode or service mode ?) is solving the
            problem :
            this sounds like unavailability of DNS at startup.

            I did not investigate that particular problem, but I
            will perform some tests soon with the last 504 (or 505).

            Yours sincerely
            Pierre



            Le 22/09/2014 19:20, [email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]> a écrit :
            Using Stunnel on several Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1
            machines (all such machines are X64 as the OS is only
            released as X64).

            During August of 2014 I reported in this forum the
            current version of Stunnel would not function as a
            service under the above OS, even if using a delayed
            start, it might run but it would not work.  I reverted
            to using version 4.35, which did work properly.

            Pierre DeLagge was kind enough to provide me with a
            copy of his patched Stunnel 5.02, which I am still
            using and which is working flawlessly on my production
            servers.  No delayed start required.

            I am wondering if Pierre's 5.02 patch has been
            incorporated into the most recently released Stunnel,
            5.04? Has anyone been successful in getting the most
            current version to actually work under the above
            environment without delaying the start of the service?

            Just to add a little color and background to the story,
            I am using the native WS2008R2SP1 SMTP server on each
            machine, in conjunction with Stunnel, so as to forward
            OS event notifications through a gmail account.



            On 09.22.2014 06:54, John Smith wrote:
            I tried 5.04. on Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise
            Service Pack 1 x64


            Same issue. Service shows as started, but no log. If I
            go manual restart it works.

            Have to put delayed startup.

            On 18 September 2014 16:15, John Smith
            <[email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                For now i'm happy with 5.03 Already in production
                so I will have to wait next time! :)

                On 17 September 2014 17:10, Michal Trojnara
                <[email protected]
                <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
                    Hash: SHA1

                    Jose Alf. wrote:
                    > Regarding stunnel service dependencies, If
                    you read the 5.04 beta
                    > announcement, the dependency is created
                    automatically now when you
                    > install stunnel as a service. Please give it
                    a try. Looks like it
                    > works for me.
                    >
                    > Thanks to Mike for implementing that.

                    Thank you for testing it.

                    Best regards,
                            Mike
                    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
                    Version: GnuPG v1

                    
iEYEARECAAYFAlQZ+NsACgkQ/NU+nXTHMtGdAgCdFUQ6YWXDdE0g4ZNoys3DSR0Q
                    yLoAnRgo4jKIzb93fzEZcV79eoAQLXMR
                    =+xFQ
                    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
                    _______________________________________________
                    stunnel-users mailing list
                    [email protected]
                    <mailto:[email protected]>
                    
https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users





            _______________________________________________
            stunnel-users mailing list
            [email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]>
            https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users



            _______________________________________________
            stunnel-users mailing list
            [email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]>
            https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users


            _______________________________________________
            stunnel-users mailing list
            [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
            https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users




        _______________________________________________
        stunnel-users mailing list
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users




    _______________________________________________
    stunnel-users mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users



_______________________________________________
stunnel-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users

Reply via email to