[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUBMARINE-49?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16843316#comment-16843316
]
Tan, Wangda commented on SUBMARINE-49:
--------------------------------------
Thanks [~snemeth] for the patch, it looks like a non-functional change. Given
it is close to 0.2.0 release, maybe we should target this to 0.2.1/0.3.0.
[[email protected]]/[~tangzhankun] have we created a branch for 0.2.0
release? We need to create one if we haven't.
And the Jira of Submarine doesn't have target version, let me create an INFRA
Jira to help add the target version field.
> Add more test coverage to RunJobParameters
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SUBMARINE-49
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUBMARINE-49
> Project: Hadoop Submarine
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Szilard Nemeth
> Assignee: Szilard Nemeth
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: SUBMARINE-49.001.patch, SUBMARINE-49.002.patch,
> SUBMARINE-49.003.patch, SUBMARINE-49.004.patch, SUBMARINE-49.004.patch,
> SUBMARINE-49.005.patch, SUBMARINE-49.006.patch
>
>
> There are some good tests in
> {{org.apache.hadoop.yarn.submarine.client.cli.TestRunJobCliParsing}}, but
> these are not testing all fields set by method
> {{org.apache.hadoop.yarn.submarine.client.cli.param.RunJobParameters#updateParametersByParsedCommandline}}.
>
> Some more extensive testing is needed in this area.
> As an added bonus, the code
> {{org.apache.hadoop.yarn.submarine.client.cli.param.RunJobParameters#updateParametersByParsedCommandline}}
> could be cleaned up a bit.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
