On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 09:17:41AM -0400, Justin C. Sherrill wrote: > On Tue, August 15, 2006 5:28 am, Victor Balada Diaz wrote: > > > It's not because there are some FreeBSD material there, but because > > when I updated the X11 chapter i got material copyrighted in the > > last two years. > > Hmm. This leads me to think of something else. Looking at the legal notice: > > http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~justin/handbook/LEGALNOTICE.html > > "Redistributions of source code (SGML DocBook) must retain the above > copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer as > the first lines of this file unmodified." > > The original copyright mentioned FreeBSD, not DragonFly. From what I'm > reading, it looks like what we need to to reproduce the FreeBSD license > verbatim, as it's required, and _also_ have a new version to cover our > work.
Dunno, i'm not a lawyer. Maybe will be best to be on the safe side and do what you're proposing. -- La prueba más fehaciente de que existe vida inteligente en otros planetas, es que no han intentado contactar con nosotros.
