On Tue, August 15, 2006 2:52 pm, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > The first part has a fixed owner, it doesn't change when someone else > modifies the handbook. The second part is a bit different though. The > copyright is the sum of all contributors and to simplify the licensing, > e.g. written forms like the FSF is using are common. So, yes the FreeBSD > copyright should be included and a DragonFly copyright be added.
I'll go forward using this model. Along those lines, if we bring in a section of documentation (say, for pkgsrc or rc or etc.) from the NetBSD Guide, we're probably going to have to explicitly mention their license too. Anyone have a friend/relative who works in copyright law? I think we're covering what we need to cover, but none of us are lawyers.
