On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Dirk Hohndel <d...@hohndel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 04:01:13PM -0300, Tomaz Canabrava wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Salvador Cuñat <salvador.cu...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2014-08-06 19:29 GMT+02:00 Tomaz Canabrava <tcanabr...@kde.org>: > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >>> This goes back to the reported bug that we currently store absolute > > >>> filenames. That's a pain when you move between machines. But a > generic > > >>> solution that works everywhere is near impossible... > > >>> > > >> > > >> A thumbnail pixmap would suffice? The user would not be able to see > the > > >> picture in full size, but it can have a glimpse of what's there. > > >> > > >> > > > I don't think this would be necessary, if the user wants to hace > access to > > > his photos from different platforms, he is probably already using some > > > cloud service, so he should be able to refer to this cloud service's > images > > > without any problem, just as one can do with the .xml divelog. > > > > > > I'm going to play a bit with this idea. > > > > > > The only thing I dislike in the photos part is the fact that they > can't be > > > erased from the tab, but from the profile thumbnail. This creates two > > > issues, the first is that a photo can't be erased if it's out of the > > > profile (e.g. drinking a beer with the buddies after diving); the > second > > > is how easy it is to click on the dustbin icon, as thumbnail grows > down and > > > right, leaving the dustbin just under the cursor pointer. > > > > > > > hm... I can add a 'delete' shotcut by hiting the delete key when > selecting > > pictures on the photos tab. > > Can you > a) move the dustbin / change the background as you promised to Willem > Will do that today, as soon as I have time. > b) create the same dustbin and action on the photo tab? > Doable, but way way harder because of the way a delegate is exposed on qt widgets. ( this is one of the things where QML is WAAAAY easier. ) > > I'd love to have (a) for 4.2. (b) is not as important. The less code we > modify between now and 4.2, the less we break :-) > > /D >
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list subsurface@hohndel.org http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface