On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 05:37:32PM +0200, Claudiu Olteanu wrote: > Yes, you are right. There is a simple white space fix in the > context of the memory leaks. I thought that since it is regarded > with the memory allocation/deallocation it wouldn't be a problem and > a second patch will be unnecessary. Sorry, my mistake. > I will create a new one when I will get home. > > I also looked over the patch sent by Salvador and I believe > that there will be no problem if we will merge this two patches. > He doesn't use the freed variables and the ones implied are deallocated > before a return statement.
Well, the patches conflict. I'm OK with a single whitespace fix in the middle. But I'd like to see new clean patches /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
