On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 08:06:42PM +0300, Miika Turkia wrote: > > Let's see. My configuration is quit old, as yours should be. I have > not tried to clear anything. But I would think that someone else > should run into this when upgrading. > > I have configured Subsurface to use local file as default, with path: > /home/mturkia/subsurface/Miika.xml > > On terminal I get the following messages (not sure if my Marble is > up-to-date): > ---8<--- > Ignoring to load the following file since it doesn't look like a valid > Marble plugin: "/boot/initrd.img-3.19.0-30-generic" > Reason: "'/boot/initrd.img-3.19.0-30-generic' is not an ELF object" > Ignoring to load the following file since it doesn't look like a valid > Marble plugin: "/boot/initrd.img-3.19.0-28-generic" > Reason: "'/boot/initrd.img-3.19.0-28-generic' is not an ELF object" > Ignoring to load the following file since it doesn't look like a valid > Marble plugin: "/boot/vmlinuz-3.19.0-30-generic" > Reason: "Permission denied" > Ignoring to load the following file since it doesn't look like a valid > Marble plugin: "/boot/vmlinuz-3.19.0-28-generic" > Reason: "Permission denied"
I thought I fixed that in Subsurface-branch of Marble. If you still get those with the latest Marble, then that is also something we desperately need to fix before the release. > qt.network.ssl: QSslSocket: cannot resolve SSLv2_client_method > qt.network.ssl: QSslSocket: cannot resolve SSLv2_server_method Yeah, weird, I get those from time to time. > cannot open "/home/mturkia/.subsurface/hashes" > ---8<--- > > The last line is the only one related to the change to .subsurface > directory. Apparently .subsurface is not created even though it is > used for something. This just makes me wonder what else might have to > be taken into account when changing the name of default directory. Or > is it even wise to switch for old users that already have everything > under the old dir. The plot thickens - I was able to recreate this once... but I have a .subsurface directory so I guess then the hashes were written. I'll take a look if maybe the image hashing ends up failing silently if the directory isn't there or something? Thanks for helping to track this down. /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface