On 12 July 2017 at 13:22, Dirk Hohndel <d...@hohndel.org> wrote: > > I enjoyed actually staying out a discussion for a while :-) > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 01:17:09AM +0300, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote: >> >> so given these complications, Qt Location might be the right choice in >> terms of eventual mobile support. > > So far on mobile we haven't had a marble equivalent - we simply open links > to Google Maps in a browser window. > > I already thought that Qt Location was likely the better solution overall, > but if that would also give us something we could use on mobile, that > would certainly shift my bias even more in that direction. >
ok, i will create a Subsurface branch and start integrating the Qt Location based map widget. will report back when there is something for preview. lubomir -- _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
