On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Dirk Hohndel <d...@hohndel.org> wrote:
> Snap and Flatpak both are different takes on what we already have with > AppImage. > The goal of AppImage was to have fewer builds to worry about. And it > brilliantly does that. > So unless there is something that is a) better and b) completely replaces > AppImage, I'm > not sure why we'd spend time on it. > It was just a thought. With Ubuntu (and others) embracing Snap, and with all major distributions supported, and a central package repository available, it might reach a larger user base and be easier to support. I obviously base this conclusion on absolutely nothing :D Happy holidays! Henrik
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
