The one thing that currently bugs me and may already be fixed since 5.0.8 was released is that the deco model on my OSMC isn’t being picked up and it instead reports as something else. As I say I think this has already been picked up but I’ve not yet tested a nightly build to confirm this is fixed.
Just wanted to flag this to ensure that this IS 100% included on the new release. I’ll try and test a nightly tomorrow. Jb Sent from my iPhone > On 30 Jul 2022, at 22:24, Dirk Hohndel via subsurface > <subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org> wrote: > > > Hi there. > > You may remember me. > > The past six weeks have been pretty rough over here. A death in my family > derailed quite a few things, including all my time (and for a while, > motivation) to work on Subsurface. > > I think / I hope that I'm back. And I'm back to hoping to do the 5.0.9 > release "any day now". > > Linus identified a really weird bug with cloudstorage that affected builds > with very recent libgit2 versions (1.2 or newer, I think). We should have > worked around this on the server (basically the newer versions of the library > throw up if HEAD points to an unborn reference). This only affected people > who used a version of Subsurface built against such a recent version of > libgit2 (Fedora 36, openSUSE 15.4), AND who tried to clone a cloud storage > repo for the first time. So people who upgraded and already had a checked out > version of their cloud repo weren't affected. > > There are a few more small things that I'm checking, but I hope to get a > release out very soon. > > All the best (and thanks to those of you who helped to keep the lights on > while I had disappeared). > > /D > _______________________________________________ > subsurface mailing list > subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org > http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface