On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Wade Brainerd <wad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I for one will have a much easier time remembering what sugar-shell means, > versus sugar-jarabe. > Personally I can't stand all these meaningless names, I currently have to > go look at the glossary each time I need to know which version of Sugar has > the activities. > > At work I have often found that confusingly named packages tend to get > adopted less easily than the sensibly named ones. > Understandable. What I was planning to do (I've yet to consult with the other maintainers on this) was to have "sugar" be a virtual package provided by "sugar-sucrose", so all you'd need to do would be to "apt-get install sugar" to get a fully-functioning sugar environment. It should be trivial to rename sugar to sugar-shell in Debian. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel