-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 11:08:11AM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 02:32, Aleksey Lim <alsr...@member.fsf.org> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> While tweaking/hacking some activities I have to, from time to time, >> copy&paste code between activities. Sometime it works well: tempo >> slider from TamTam activities means 20-30 lines and 5-7 images. Now >> (for Speak activity) I need ChatBox widget from Chat and it costs 400 >> lines. >> >> Its a good idea to support those 400 lines in one repo. Whats the >> right place for it? And in common, should we collect such >> widgets/libraries in one place, sugar-toolkit? new project >> sugar-widgets? > >A new project seems like more work for both upstream developers and >packagers. Any downsides if we put them in sugar-toolkit?
A benefit of using a separate package could be (depending on which features from recent versions of core packages that it rely on) that it could work even with existing deployments using Sugar 0.82! - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkmG3ecACgkQn7DbMsAkQLhcOQCgozsNqouy9n84d86P92BRqZSl dkMAnRyWHN9TLnd4sqWStk0f8OJ3glmu =3NMh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel