On 18 Feb 2009, at 21:48, David Farning wrote: > There has been some talk of what the final name for aslo should be. > > addons.sugarlabs.org > or > activities.sugarlabs.org
+1 to activities, it's sugar friendly, relevant, and to be honest 'addons' as a (non-dictionary) name seems alien to me with vague references to firefox tech (which I do occasionally use when a site complains about Safari) but that will have no direct meaning for majority of Sugar users. > Which do you prefer? I like activities.sl.o better but it means more > work for me to change it. So, for me, it is a wash. > > david > > (Contributors with marketing or brand development can have two votes) > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
