On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 9:00 PM, Bryan Berry <br...@olenepal.org> wrote: > On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 12:25 -0500, David Farning wrote: >> Project/SIGs are product focused. The exist to help guide a project >> through it's life cycle. For example, there has recently been some >> rather heated discussions about working more closely with Qt. This is >> an example of a idea the could start as a SIG and grow into a project >> and be included in the Learning Platform.... if it proves useful. > > Sorry to have not been involved in this conversation. > > So it sounds to me like Karma should be an SL SIG and later an SL > Project. I really don't have an idea of how it will be governed but I > will leave that to later as i see how the community around it develops. > So I guess Karma can't progress from SIG to project until the leadership > process is defined. > > I feel bad because I have been putting the SL logo on the > karmaeducation.org site. Sorry if I was using the SL branding > prematurely. I also put the SL logo in the Karma presentations. >
Huh? Seems like an appropriate use of the logo to me. -walter > > -- > Bryan W. Berry > Technology Director > OLE Nepal, http://www.olenepal.org > > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel