Bernie Innocenti wrote: > The use cases that work now would continue to work with any package > format.
That's definitely not true. One option (the one I thought you were advocating) is to make Activities just like any other software installed by the distribution package manager. That means they'd be RPM on Fedora and DEB on Debian. Two Sugar 0.84 x86 installs, one on Debian and one on Fedora, can currently push Activity bundles back and forth with some probability of success. If Activities in Sugar-0.88 on Debian are packaged as .deb, then clearly Fedora will have no idea what to do with them, and so pushing Activities over the network would no longer work.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
