Bernie Innocenti wrote: > A fixed platform with infinite backwards compatibility is a dream even > for an interpreted language.
Java. > Right now, we're just closing our eyes pretending that we are immune > from the dependency problems and that the .xo package format will > suffice. Do you really believe this? It depends what you mean. I really do believe we _could_ implement a highly usable system in which Activities are completely self-contained portable bundles. For example, see Android. I don't believe that we _have_ implemented such a system. I do believe that we _should_, because it maximizes the ability of users to predict how their system will behave, and predictability is the core of usability and security.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
