Yeah, Stop and Don't Stop sound best to me. Cancel is almost never an appropriate button; we should grep the codebase for it :)
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <to...@sugarlabs.org> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 13:32, Gabriel Eirea <gei...@gmail.com> wrote: >> How about "Quit" and "Don't quit"? > > That would be better, though activities are stopped, rather than quitted. > > Thanks, > > Tomeu > >> 2009/10/19 Tomeu Vizoso <to...@sugarlabs.org>: >>> Any ideas for a better wording? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Tomeu >>> >>> On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 00:40, Sugar Labs Bugs >>> <bugtracker-nore...@sugarlabs.org> wrote: >>>> #1508: confusing wording on download from Browse >>>> ------------------------------------------+--------------------------------- >>>> Reporter: walter | Owner: erikos >>>> Type: enhancement | Status: new >>>> Priority: Unspecified by Maintainer | Milestone: Unspecified by >>>> Release Team >>>> Component: Browse | Version: Git as of >>>> bugdate >>>> Severity: Trivial | Keywords: >>>> Distribution: Unspecified | Status_field: Unconfirmed >>>> ------------------------------------------+--------------------------------- >>>> If you try to quit Browse in the middle of a download, you are told that >>>> quiting will "cancel" the download and you are presented with two buttons: >>>> cancel and stop. Hitting the stop button will cancel the download and >>>> hitting the cancel button will cancel the quitting, hence not cancel the >>>> download. I wonder if there are better words we can use to make this a bit >>>> less confusing. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Ticket URL: <http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/1508> >>>> Sugar Labs <http://sugarlabs.org/> >>>> Sugar Labs bug tracking system >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Bugs mailing list >>>> b...@lists.sugarlabs.org >>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/bugs >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> «Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar. >>> What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» - David >>> Farning >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Sugar-devel mailing list >>> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >>> >> > > > > -- > «Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar. > What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» - David > Farning > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel