On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 05:26:36PM -0400, Walter Bender wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> wrote:
* Do newest release of Browse work on 0.84?
Checking ASLO, Browse 112 is marked as working with 0.86; Browse 108 is marked as working with 0.84.
Thanks.I was aiming at more general lists of info, however - Browse just being one example.
I can go hunt down the info at ASLO for each and every chunk of code related to Sugar in some way. But that would be too error prone, and I feel that my time then would be better spent not giving a shit about "compliance" with Sugarlabs and just throw together for Debian what I findworks together - not caring if it is coming from Sugarlabs or from other sources.
Can you follow how I would like a more coordinated approach?I guess what I really try to express here is that I imagine that distributors in general would appreciate if Sugarlabs maintained info on what was considered the "official" core Sugar for each major release of it - somewhere easy for distributors to compara against.
Kind regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
