On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Aleksey Lim <alsr...@member.fsf.org> wrote: >> Should we consider the existing journal officially unmaintained and >> look for candidates? > > In fact I'm sure maintainer should have some vision about how project > should grow, w/o such vision maintainer should pass his responsibility. > In my case, I have such vision but it's incompatible with existed scheme > (journal is only particular case) and will be lucky to pass Journal.
That's a sad, but respectable position to take. Extending, enriching and transforming the Journal is a key thing for Sugar. Of course, it is good to see exploration and experimentation in Activities that do Journal-ish things, but the Journal is a central element of our usage model, so I hope it incorporates new tricks (perhaps new tricks explored in separate Activities). cheers, m -- martin.langh...@gmail.com mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
