On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Aleksey Lim <alsr...@member.fsf.org> wrote:
>> Should we consider the existing journal officially unmaintained and
>> look for candidates?
>
> In fact I'm sure maintainer should have some vision about how project
> should grow, w/o such vision maintainer should pass his responsibility.
> In my case, I have such vision but it's incompatible with existed scheme
> (journal is only particular case) and will be lucky to pass Journal.

That's a sad, but respectable position to take. Extending, enriching
and transforming the Journal is a key thing for Sugar.

Of course, it is good to see exploration and experimentation in
Activities that do Journal-ish things, but the Journal is a central
element of our usage model, so I hope it incorporates new tricks
(perhaps new tricks explored in separate Activities).

cheers,


m
-- 
 martin.langh...@gmail.com
 mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
_______________________________________________
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Reply via email to