El Sun, 04-07-2010 a las 02:29 +0100, Gary Martin escribió:
> > Also, I don't know if I have the permission to change resolution > > status when something hasn't been touched for 12+ months. If I were > > to change status on likely candidates, would this anger the other > > developers? > > > I know it's sensitive, for us slightly more delicate souls, but if you > feel strongly about a bug status... I'd say go for its change of > status. It will trigger either action/indifference from genuinely > interested parties, possibly patches/discussion, action, and glory ;) > Yes, I would encourage users to apply the Be Bold mantra [1] to the bug tracker as well as the wiki. If in doubt, go ahead and change. If you were wrong, someone will revert your change. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Be_bold > It seems fair to say there is some level of (completely > understandable) analysis paralysis for some level of bugs. Bug triage > activity is at a low at the moment. Don't apologise for bringing that > task back up in everyones focus/face. Low? Not really: http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/timeline -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel