On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 01:08:30PM -0300, Andrés Ambrois wrote:
> On Monday, August 23, 2010 04:25:48 am Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> >
> > - creation time will be always displayed as '%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S' ? What
> > about those countries where they expect the fields being ordered in a
> > different way? (may be good to format the string in listview.py
> > instead of in listmodel.py, so we keep UI decisions out from the
> > model).
>
> I agree with that separation of concerns. In fact it was initially that way,
> but the format is required by activities such as Etoys, that break unless we
> use it. Other activities may also be depending on it, as it is documented in
> [0].
If are talking about UI representaion, then it is ok ("ago" format).
About internal representaion, Andrés, for what readon we store ctime in ISO,
what about int value (to keep it in the same format as timestamp)?
--
Aleksey
_______________________________________________
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
