Hi Bernie, Funny this should come up. When Sebastian and I were packaging up sugar and deps for EPEL-6 I discovered this and scratched my head over it but haven't had time to follow up. Looking through the various sugar packages I see most of them use python-simplejson so if it could be verified that sugar-datastore does in fact work with python-simplejson I would happily change it over to simplify and reduce deps.
Peter On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:05 AM, Bernie Innocenti <ber...@codewiz.org> wrote: > Forwarding to the Sugar development list. > > IIRC, we had switched to cjson only for a short time. Sugar 0.88 uses > simplejson. > > So, maybe the dependencies of the rpm have not been adjusted > accordingly. > > --------- Mensaje reenviado -------- > De: Felix Schwarz <felix.schw...@oss.schwarz.eu> > Para: sugar-datastore-ow...@fedoraproject.org, > python-cjson-ow...@fedoraproject.org > Asunto: Dependency on python-cjson - dead upstream > Fecha: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 20:32:29 +0200 > > Hi, > > sugar-datastore in Fedora currently depends on python-cjson. The latter > package has basically a dead upstream and a lot of bugs that never will be > fixed. > > As sugar-datastore is the only package in Fedora that requires python-cjson > I'm curious if it would be possible to get rid of python-cjson in Fedora. > Usually it is quite easy to migrate to python-simplejson (or just to use the > built-in JSON module from Python itself). > > Please note: I'm just asking how hard your dependency on cjson is, I'm not > planning on removing the package immediately. (actually I'm not even the > maintainer of that one :-). > > fs > > > -- > // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ > \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel