On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 19:00, Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:18:32PM -0400, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> >> This release is only made because a 0.90.0 was made before 0.88.1. So with >> this, the latest released code has the highest version number, although >> unfortunately we have an unstable release with an even number. Sorry for the >> confusion, time will fix it somewhat. > > Not sure if I am the only one still confused here: is presence-service > abandoned for 0.90 branch of Sugar, should 0.90.x be used? or should 0.90.x > be used for 0.88 branch and 0.89.x be used for 0.90 branch? Or...?!? > > Could you perhaps spell out explicitly for all Sugar branches which release > of sugar-presence-service to use (if at all)?
Sure: Sucrose 0.84 -> PS 0.84.1 Sucrose 0.86 -> PS 0.86.0 Sucrose 0.88 -> PS 0.88.0 Sucrose 0.90 -> PS 0.90.1 >From 0.90 the PS is only needed by Etoys and will be completely dropped in 0.92, hopefully. Regards, Tomeu > > Kind regards, > > - Jonas > > -- > * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt > * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ > > [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) > > iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJMdUwcAAoJECx8MUbBoAEh2wUQAJh+mp4/c8Me23aHb7LdY5Eh > hgbJZf9k8Xwlq021CqaFEgl02g/duw0woM90iyBo8IQjPdfpo96jaquYo/KB7f+K > xGfttrusWHC/gS6R7JMD5540qcUvEOOWTHjPzhPRV5jYT+b6X+PM/jIyeZJzj87b > s5gi2vu9jdyM+EN1NbAoMxAqLMNyHYUsiyEiM2OBx6aHp/wlm5Q3stBVsIGkKmPE > 3hx6eGDqvHRQYr5OqlBSzOB+g2IxX9b7wDm/DYQ0vUKeQrCf1ZqyIhkLwMFmi+eH > 7bTSw7UY7gEjCrk+z6KgisX0msX6ZcYLIE2jcESrgcfYCyJv7+yaePy9rCATgyKd > bneEZd3YYTYWPt9TBITzs3/u4W+7ICzwSn+Kqi2NiUPMXkU4YrA7l0WvVq2gcpL7 > lfJh7bewoSp6wDR6py47b8efERAIeFnZ/0ZTlKmUtyUb+mFqorNS8dAizby2Gp8+ > l9ELpIUvseVJ3CHIGCJb2HgnlKEjAoRVtG+rkljq5CyAySl53pZO2aXHO+GOrBz+ > KOdZmQTu9a/SOBTXptTdW7pSDQLNZQXIShSvwB2NpcDee0TQh9IztITfWuF2fscI > Ylxogd4uzlXriMkVZBa55S2XfrfnGnkFUwcCs+jl09JkLuX5gFBtOkOEbDqTXyor > Rf0PxzJD8zqh48vFxr96 > =vY7b > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
