Sascha, please keep me on cc if you want me to notice your replies. I sort all messages from mailing-lists into separate folders that I quickly check for interesting threads only when I have some free time.
OTOH, I won't cc you because you told me that you find it annoying. El Fri, 03-09-2010 a las 10:23 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso escribió: > On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 23:06, Sascha Silbe > <sascha-ml-reply-to-201...@silbe.org> wrote: > > The only reason I still haven't removed GConf-dbus is that I lack > > patches for the _documentation_, not the code. > > We explain how to use SUGAR_PROFILE to run multiple instances of Sugar > > in parallel, but not how to do the same using multiple OS-level user > > accounts. I've put my very simple recipe for testing collaboration here: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Collaboration#Testing Is there a better place? I'm glad to write any amount of documentation needed if it's a step in the direction of killing support for multiple user profiles in Sugar and the complexity that goes with it :-) PS: I spoke to tomeu & marcopg on IRC. Another reason for keeping GConf-dbus around is letting users test sugar without system-wide installation of new schemas. There doesn't seem to be an easy way to allow local schemas. Because GConf-dbus is such a huge PITA, perhaps we could live with this annoyance of requiring users to do "sudo gconftool..." every time they need to update schemas? -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel