Sorry, I haven't read *all* of the linked documents, but... Congrats on getting a minimal GTK3 port running so quickly! That's very impressive.
I'd originally thought that refactoring the Sugar API into more independent modules would be a necessary part of the effort, just to be able to do a more incremental port. I'd like to see that refactoring happen, but I guess it's good that it's not on the critical path? It seems like you ought to be able to port sugar-the-window-manager and sugar-the-library-used-by-activities separately, and run gtk2 activities under gtk3 window manager and vice-versa. But maybe maintaining that compatibility is just more trouble than it's worth. --scott -- ( http://cscott.net ) _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
