On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 08:04:47AM +0500, Sebastian Silva wrote: > In general I'd propose avoiding 1.0 as long as we haven't implemented > the full HIG. > I think "1.0" tells users we are comfortable with a finished, generally > not buggy product and should not be used for signifying a technology > change, which in its first iteration is bound to not be perfect.
+1, if during the process of moving to GTK3 sugar will be matured in all directions that it will be ready for 1.0, then switch to 1.0 is obvious. But not sure if it is a good idea to mix switching to gtk3 and trying to be 1.0 (as a well matured platform) at the same time. -- Aleksey _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
