I don't think so. One scale would be ok, the screens are no so different, and with screens with 11:6 relation, the activities will fill the remaining space.
Gonzalo On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Esteban Bordón <ebor...@plan.ceibal.edu.uy > wrote: > Would be better to discompose SUGAR_SCALING in two separate variables, > something like SUGAR_SCALING_W and SUGAR_SCALING_H > > chhers, > Esteban. > > > > > 2011/8/26 Frederick Grose <fgr...@gmail.com> > >> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Rafael Ortiz < >> raf...@activitycentral.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi. >>> >>> We are beginning to adapt activities to a JumPC (Olidata) Screen >>> resolution fixed to [800 x 480], afaik sugar scaling is set to 70% or 100%, >>> this shouldn't be enough for some cases as flavio pointed out..we are going >>> to test adding the zoom() method to hardcoded sizes, but medium term we >>> shall come out with a way of having different values for sugar-scaling in >>> order to fit these kind of screens. >>> >>> Thoughts on this are appreciated!., >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >>> Dextrose mailing list >>> dextr...@lists.sugarlabs.org >>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/dextrose >> >> >> Forwarding to sugar-devel, as this is a good question for future support >> of Sugar in small screen devices. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Dextrose mailing list >> dextr...@lists.sugarlabs.org >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/dextrose >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Dextrose mailing list > dextr...@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/dextrose > >
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
