I agree, the point of naming the variables is to have different names.... Gonzalo
> > http://git.sugarlabs.org/speak/mainline/commit/b7c2e4d33cee6757ef1f9a960a9fca65f242f5c9 > > and I wonder if it really solves the problem from a L10n perspective. > > Changing %s to %(speak)s may trick the cron job from thinking there is > a problem, but as long as both subject and object are represented by > the same variable name [ either %s or %(speak)s ], I don't see how it > will work well for localizers whose languages have different syntaxes. > > "Sorry, I can't %(speak)s, let's %(speak)s instead." > > maybe it will work, but I'm a little skeptical. > > cjl > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > I looked at this commit
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
