On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Gonzalo Odiard <gonz...@laptop.org> wrote:
> I agree, the point of naming the variables is to have different names.... > > Gonzalo > > > >> >> http://git.sugarlabs.org/speak/mainline/commit/b7c2e4d33cee6757ef1f9a960a9fca65f242f5c9 >> >> and I wonder if it really solves the problem from a L10n perspective. >> >> Changing %s to %(speak)s may trick the cron job from thinking there is >> a problem, but as long as both subject and object are represented by >> the same variable name [ either %s or %(speak)s ], I don't see how it >> will work well for localizers whose languages have different syntaxes. >> >> "Sorry, I can't %(speak)s, let's %(speak)s instead." >> >> maybe it will work, but I'm a little skeptical. >> >> cjl >> > What about "Sorry, I can't %(speak)s, let's %(talk)s instead." > _______________________________________________ >> Sugar-devel mailing list >> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >> > I looked at this commit > > > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > >
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
