On 23 Apr 2012, at 19:31, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Walter Bender <[email protected]> > wrote: > It may well be time to abandon our chemestry taxonomy and go to > something less obscure. > > > +1 may be was cool in a moment, but does not help in any way.
+1 (heads-up that we will need to update quite a few wiki pages, links and make sure external packagers know where to look for source). --Gary > Maybe we can start a new thread on that topic? > > Ok > > The purpose of this thread is to advance the notion of breaking up > Honey. Moving half of Honey to Fructose doesn't solve the issues that > Chris raised re performance. It was my thought that while we made the > split, we could use the split to help prioritize the work for the i18n > team. > > > I think we include 42 activities (from the point of view of l10n) > This is a big number for pootle performance? > > Gonzalo > > > > regards. > > -walter > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Chris Leonard <[email protected]> > wrote: > > So Gonzalo and Anish, you guys are suggesting a switch (in Pootle) to > > something like: > > > > Fructose > Default Activities > > > > Honey > Additional Activities 1 > > > Additional Activities 2 > > > > Am I getting that right? > > > > cjl > > _______________________________________________ > > Sugar-devel mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > > > -- > Walter Bender > Sugar Labs > http://www.sugarlabs.org > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
