On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Simon Schampijer <si...@schampijer.de> wrote: > Chris, can you please have another look. > > Thanks, > Simon who awaits to have a buildbot again soon
Simon, As unfortunate as it is that you've waited a day or more for a fix, please allow me to point out that I had attempted raise this issue proactively on this list over two weeks ago, and got absolutely not response. With Sugar 0.96 released, when to fork Pootle? http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2012-June/037775.html Admittedly I mistakenly used the word "fork" when I should have said "branch", but my meaning should have been clear from context. Please create the sucrose-0.96 branches for sugar-base and sugar-toolkit as requested in my previous message so I can properly and unambiguously branch in Pootle, which will give me more latitude to attempt fixes without risking unrecoverable loss of work by the localization community. In addition, I have had not yet gotten any feedback on whether the trimming of the obsoleted strings had any impact on the issues encountered with the aym or id PO files during the build process. That would be very useful information to have, even if the km issue is not exactly the same. I sincerely appreciate the work you've done and continue to do as release manager and understand all-too-well the frustration that can result from waiting for someone else to do their part of a large collaborative process with lots of rapidly moving pieces Regards, cjl Sugar Labs Translation Team Coordinator _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel