Hi Chris,
On 06/16/2012 10:19 AM, Chris Leonard wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Simon Schampijer <si...@schampijer.de> wrote:
Chris, can you please have another look.
Thanks,
Simon who awaits to have a buildbot again soon
Simon,
As unfortunate as it is that you've waited a day or more for a fix,
please allow me to point out that I had attempted raise this issue
proactively on this list over two weeks ago, and got absolutely not
response.
Ok, there might have been some misunderstanding. All the branches are
now up for your consumption.
I am keen on the buildbot because that gives you a way to verify if
pushes have been causing build breakage. Daniel's buildbot is what we
have for now: http://176.58.108.37:8010/waterfall
With Sugar 0.96 released, when to fork Pootle?
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2012-June/037775.html
Admittedly I mistakenly used the word "fork" when I should have said
"branch", but my meaning should have been clear from context.
Please create the sucrose-0.96 branches for sugar-base and
sugar-toolkit as requested in my previous message so I can properly
and unambiguously branch in Pootle, which will give me more latitude
to attempt fixes without risking unrecoverable loss of work by the
localization community.
In addition, I have had not yet gotten any feedback on whether the
trimming of the obsoleted strings had any impact on the issues
encountered with the aym or id PO files during the build process.
That would be very useful information to have, even if the km issue is
not exactly the same.
The aym and id files did build fine now. The km one is still broken. If
that is the information you were asking for.
I sincerely appreciate the work you've done and continue to do as
release manager and understand all-too-well the frustration that can
result from waiting for someone else to do their part of a large
collaborative process with lots of rapidly moving pieces
I think you misunderstood here. At least I had no attention to sound
frustrated at you. I just think that the buildbot is a great tool to
help us deliver the best possible result, that's all. Of course we do
see some build failures due to translations but I don't want to count
the failures we had to those fuzzy coders :)
Regards,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
