> > > I am not sure what problem we are trying to solve. If I give you any > release number > than the latest gtk2 version, won't that solve your > problem? And if I label that release with 0.96+ in ASLO, won't that > resolve itself re old Sugar systems? I think the solution may lie in > simply not making tar balls for gtk2 versions. > > -walter > > It's true you can just don't publish tarballs of gtk2 versions, but probably will be confusing for the users. Should be good if we can agree in a consistent numbers in activities. If we decide the proposed schema does not works (dotted version for gtk2, integer for gtk3) we should talk and define a new one. I like the proposal from Peter, just start with 100 with gtk3 versions looks sane.
Gonzalo > -- > Walter Bender > Sugar Labs > http://www.sugarlabs.org > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
