On Friday, 28 September 2012, Walter Bender wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Gonzalo Odiard > <gonz...@laptop.org<javascript:;>> > wrote: > >> > >> I am not sure what problem we are trying to solve. If I give you any > >> release number > than the latest gtk2 version, won't that solve your > >> problem? And if I label that release with 0.96+ in ASLO, won't that > >> resolve itself re old Sugar systems? I think the solution may lie in > >> simply not making tar balls for gtk2 versions. > >> > >> -walter > >> > > > > It's true you can just don't publish tarballs of gtk2 versions, > > but probably will be confusing for the users. > > Should be good if we can agree in a consistent numbers in activities. > > If we decide the proposed schema does not works (dotted version for gtk2, > > integer for gtk3) we should talk and define a new one. > > I like the proposal from Peter, just start with 100 with gtk3 versions > > looks sane. > > I don't agree re 100+ simply because some activities already have > greater than 100 versions (TA, Browse, etc.). We could start at 1000, > I suppose. But why not just use even for gtk2 and odd for gtk3? >
IMO we don't need consistency between activities about the number, just about the general approach (i.e. gtk3 starting with a number high enough that gtk2 < gtk3). About even and odd, I guess it would work if you make sure the highest number is always gtk3. Which is possible but feels a bit complicated to me, I don't know. -- Daniel Narvaez
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel