On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Ignacio Rodríguez <nachoe...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have my feature :) > > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Icon_Change > > PD: Walter I need the *.patch ¿Remember?
OK. Can you point me to the code in git? -walter > > > 2013/3/28 Martin Abente <martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarv...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> we already had a bit of discussion on what 0.100 should focus on in >>> the schedule thread. I'll try to summarize it here. >>> >>> IMPORTANT: the consensus seems to be that we should be having the >>> discussion about features early this cycle, to try and narrow the >>> scope of the release as much as possible. So here is your chance to >>> propose features, there won't be a feature acceptance deadline later. >>> >>> * Simon proposed that we make html5 activities the main focus of the >>> release and people responded favorably (do you think that's a bad >>> idea? Please speak up!). We need to articulate better what this >>> involves exactly, which new glucose components will have to be >>> developed, which activities. There as been some experimentation but >>> there is more left to do, the initial part of the cycle will involve >>> research. >>> >>> * Ajay proposed a couple of features which has been delayed from >>> previous cycles. >>> >>> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Multi_selection >>> >>> There is some concern that it might be too big of a change. We should >>> probably decide on the base of the patches that Ajay will be sending >>> out soon. >>> >> >> >> I hope everyone considers that the journal-multi-selection feature has >> passed through several iterations of design and code review already. This a >> great improvement to journal's usability and is already being used in the >> ground. >> >> It was a joint effort between many SL community members since EduJAM 2011, >> so I think there should be a consensus towards accepting it. >> >>> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/3G_Support/Database_Support >>> >>> It seems to be ready to go in. >>> >>> * Walter proposed a few other features which went already through >>> several reviews (do we have feature pages for these perhaps?) >>> >>> - homeview background image >> >> >> I know, at first hand, that Caacupe (Paraguay) kids will be more than >> happy with this ^. We should support also features that makes Sugar more >> enjoyable to it's users. >> >>> >>> - multi-homeview >>> >>> - webservices >>> - comment field in journal detail view >>> >> >> We should also keep in mind that webservices can offer a lot of utilities >> for deployments in the near future, and it will give Sugar a another way to >> expand its capabilities without "writing-from-scratch" everything. >> >>> >>> >>> >>> So 0.100 seems to be shaping up as a release devoted mainly to html5 >>> activities, while landing a few features which are almost ready. What >>> does everyone think about that? >>> >>> -- >>> Daniel Narvaez >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Sugar-devel mailing list >>> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sugar-devel mailing list >> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >> > -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel