Walter, you have the *.zip in your mail :P (Remember?)
2013/3/28 Walter Bender <walter.ben...@gmail.com> > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Ignacio Rodríguez <nachoe...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I have my feature :) > > > > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Icon_Change > > > > PD: Walter I need the *.patch ¿Remember? > > OK. Can you point me to the code in git? > > -walter > > > > > > 2013/3/28 Martin Abente <martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarv...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> we already had a bit of discussion on what 0.100 should focus on in > >>> the schedule thread. I'll try to summarize it here. > >>> > >>> IMPORTANT: the consensus seems to be that we should be having the > >>> discussion about features early this cycle, to try and narrow the > >>> scope of the release as much as possible. So here is your chance to > >>> propose features, there won't be a feature acceptance deadline later. > >>> > >>> * Simon proposed that we make html5 activities the main focus of the > >>> release and people responded favorably (do you think that's a bad > >>> idea? Please speak up!). We need to articulate better what this > >>> involves exactly, which new glucose components will have to be > >>> developed, which activities. There as been some experimentation but > >>> there is more left to do, the initial part of the cycle will involve > >>> research. > >>> > >>> * Ajay proposed a couple of features which has been delayed from > >>> previous cycles. > >>> > >>> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Multi_selection > >>> > >>> There is some concern that it might be too big of a change. We should > >>> probably decide on the base of the patches that Ajay will be sending > >>> out soon. > >>> > >> > >> > >> I hope everyone considers that the journal-multi-selection feature has > >> passed through several iterations of design and code review already. > This a > >> great improvement to journal's usability and is already being used in > the > >> ground. > >> > >> It was a joint effort between many SL community members since EduJAM > 2011, > >> so I think there should be a consensus towards accepting it. > >> > >>> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/3G_Support/Database_Support > >>> > >>> It seems to be ready to go in. > >>> > >>> * Walter proposed a few other features which went already through > >>> several reviews (do we have feature pages for these perhaps?) > >>> > >>> - homeview background image > >> > >> > >> I know, at first hand, that Caacupe (Paraguay) kids will be more than > >> happy with this ^. We should support also features that makes Sugar more > >> enjoyable to it's users. > >> > >>> > >>> - multi-homeview > >>> > >>> - webservices > >>> - comment field in journal detail view > >>> > >> > >> We should also keep in mind that webservices can offer a lot of > utilities > >> for deployments in the near future, and it will give Sugar a another > way to > >> expand its capabilities without "writing-from-scratch" everything. > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> So 0.100 seems to be shaping up as a release devoted mainly to html5 > >>> activities, while landing a few features which are almost ready. What > >>> does everyone think about that? > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Daniel Narvaez > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Sugar-devel mailing list > >>> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > >>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Sugar-devel mailing list > >> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > >> > > > > > > -- > Walter Bender > Sugar Labs > http://www.sugarlabs.org >
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel