I have closed #690610, because my test case was wrong. The fix is in vte #676999 and pygobject #690041, but also can needed other fixes in the management of GArray in pygobject.
I don't know what is the state of these libraries on debian and ubuntu, but can imagine the terminal maintainer will accept a patch to avoid the error if the feature is not available. Probably safer do a try catch, because the method can be available, but non working depending on the libraries state. Gonzalo On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Simon Schampijer <si...@schampijer.de>wrote: > On 05/30/2013 12:00 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > >> The upstream bug seems to have no activity? >> >> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/**show_bug.cgi?id=690610<https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=690610> >> > > Right, that is why I have no clue what fix Gonzalo means. Anyhow, he will > let us know. > > Simon > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.**org <Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/**listinfo/sugar-devel<http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel> >
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel