On 30 May 2013 14:11, Gonzalo Odiard <gonz...@laptop.org> wrote:

> I have closed #690610, because my test case was wrong.
>
> The fix is in vte #676999 and pygobject #690041,
> but also can needed other fixes in the management of GArray in pygobject.
>
> I don't know what is the state of these libraries on debian and ubuntu,
> but can imagine the terminal maintainer will accept a patch to avoid
> the error if the feature is not available.
>
> Probably safer do a try catch, because the method can be available,
> but non working depending on the libraries state.
>

Yeah please add a try/catch or revert the patch until we have a fix that
doesn't break the build.

Thanks.
_______________________________________________
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Reply via email to