On 30 May 2013 14:11, Gonzalo Odiard <gonz...@laptop.org> wrote: > I have closed #690610, because my test case was wrong. > > The fix is in vte #676999 and pygobject #690041, > but also can needed other fixes in the management of GArray in pygobject. > > I don't know what is the state of these libraries on debian and ubuntu, > but can imagine the terminal maintainer will accept a patch to avoid > the error if the feature is not available. > > Probably safer do a try catch, because the method can be available, > but non working depending on the libraries state. >
Yeah please add a try/catch or revert the patch until we have a fix that doesn't break the build. Thanks.
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel