On 06/13/2013 01:32 AM, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
2013/6/7 Daniel Narvaez <dwnarv...@gmail.com>:
I'm still undecided really but since it's important to make a call soon, my
vote goes for Apache, both for sugar-web and for activities we develop.
I'm far from expert on licenses, but given Daniel Narvaez description,
I vote for Apache too.
--
.. manuq ..
Mozilla for gaia seems to be going for the Apache 2 license [1]. Here
are two posts with some background information about the licensing [2][3].
I could not find any information about what is the license that
can/should be used in the web apps developed for Firefox OS. The example
apps have different ones, some none, the documentation does not talk
about it.
Regards,
Simon
[1]
https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/commit/73fd5736a13dc05f3e47246bbae9810f2f5aaec5
[2] http://blog.gerv.net/2013/01/mozilla-and-non-copyleft-licensing/
[3] https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/2012-November/002664.html
[4] https://marketplace.firefox.com/developers/docs/reference_apps
_______________________________________________
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
