On 13 June 2013 11:26, Simon Schampijer <si...@schampijer.de> wrote: > On 06/13/2013 01:32 AM, Manuel QuiƱones wrote: > >> 2013/6/7 Daniel Narvaez <dwnarv...@gmail.com>: >> >>> I'm still undecided really but since it's important to make a call soon, >>> my >>> vote goes for Apache, both for sugar-web and for activities we develop. >>> >> >> I'm far from expert on licenses, but given Daniel Narvaez description, >> I vote for Apache too. >> >> -- >> .. manuq .. >> > > Mozilla for gaia seems to be going for the Apache 2 license [1]. Here are > two posts with some background information about the licensing [2][3]. > > I could not find any information about what is the license that can/should > be used in the web apps developed for Firefox OS. The example apps have > different ones, some none, the documentation does not talk about it. >
I guess that's left to the activity authors to decide.
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel