On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Sebastian Silva <sebast...@fuentelibre.org> wrote: > In Flavio's defense, I'd like to restructure this conversation. > > Undoubtedly, he's put great effort in this work.
And there are mechanisms for incorporating that work for the benefit of all. > From a deployment's point of view, it's a contribution. I would think deployments would rather have contributions upstreamed so they do not incur maintenance costs long term. > From Gonzalo's POV, it's a burden because Flavio hasn't taken up learning to > master Git. Mastering certain elements of git are essential to contribute to a pre-existing longstanding core element of Sugar like TamTam. > From Localizer's POV it's a burden because, in their view, it implies double > the strings. > These are representatives up "upstream". Localizers are not "upstream" representatives, they are "downstream" collaborators using a common upstream infrastructure. _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
