On 26 December 2013 17:35, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 26 December 2013 17:30, Emil Dudev <emildu...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> My changes to the makefiles only add gsettings support. GConf can >> still be used and I doubt there will be any problems. >> > > That's what I expect too but let's test if after migration gconf > activities still works the same as before. > > >> While I was working on this, the following article came to my >> attention: https://developer.gnome.org/gio/2.26/ch26s07.html >> From what I understand of the article, the transition can be made >> without affecting any of the activities. >> > > Unfortunately the article says the backend should not be used in > production :/ > > To summarize my proposal: > > * Move most settings to use GSettings > * For the few settings which the activity are currently using, set them > both in GSettings and GConf. > * Deprecate GConf support so that activity authors will gradually migrate > to GSettings. > Btw, this also seems to be the approach suggested in the migration guide https://developer.gnome.org/gio/2.26/ch26.html -- Daniel Narvaez
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
