On Sat, 2014-05-17 at 02:34 -0300, Ignacio RodrÃguez wrote: > About 4751 I remember to have the same problem on first try to port > icon_size to pixel_size > > http://people.sugarlabs.org/ignacio/Without%20IconSize.png > I am seeing #4751 and #4673 in osbuild at present (but my osbuild is not error free).
What I am seeing in osbuild, and referring to the above screenshot, (ref #4751) is: the actual icon is 27 pixels wide, same as I expect the "original Frame" appears as expected 54 / 56 pixels wide, the "distorted Frame", say 72 pixels wide, takes its distortion from the "carrier". By "carrier" I refer partially to the grey background of the clipping, but more specifically the "area_highlighted_on_select". [I am not sure of my use of the word "palette" in this context. Does palette="area_highlighted_on_select"?] Is it right to say that the frame is distorted by the palette, rather than the icon? > So, I think this is a problem of pixel_size > So, is it a problem of the pixel_size in the palette, rather than pixel_size in the icon? > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel