Quoting Sebastian Silva (2016-03-01 17:21:07) > On 01/03/16 10:16, Gustavo Duarte wrote: >> If mostly Browser are supporting Flash, like Firefox, Chrome and >> Epiphany, why Browse Activity, not ? >> Browse is based on Webkit (Chrome and Safari also) and Webkit support >> Flash.
Google-based browsers originally derived their _rendering_ engine on Webkit, but you need to check which _plugin_ API is used. Mozilla-based browsers use NPAPI for their plugins, Google-based browsers use PPAPI plugins. I don't know which API Webkit-based browsers use, if any at all. > This is really not true. Only Chrome supports flash, with an in-house > proprietary plugin from Google. The rest, all try to use the last know > - faulty and insecure - unsupported 11.x plugin released several years > ago. Firefox is in the process of killing the old plugin API too. Not quite true: Wrappers exist to use the Google (PPAPI) plugin in Mozilla (NPAPI) browsers: https://github.com/i-rinat/freshplayerplugin - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel